KBS Reference Desk: Teachers Wearing Safety Pins

Q:        Several high school teachers have started to wear safety pins on their shirts in protest of the recent presidential election. The teachers have taken to Facebook to publicize their cause and it has resulted in many debates at school between students and staff. One such debate resulted in two students engaging in a fist fight. Can we prohibit the teachers from wearing the safety pins to work?

A:        Probably. While not an overtly political display, wearing items with political meaning is considered “symbolic speech” protected by the First Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, has ruled that public school teachers may be reasonably limited in their protected speech if it creates a disruption to the school.

After the recent presidential election, many began wearing safety pins on their shirts as a sign of political solidarity with marginalized groups. The display is meant to signify a “link,” showing support for racial minorities, immigrants, members of the LGBT community and other minority groups. While wearing a safety pin may not be as overt a political message as, say, wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat, this type of speech may still be limited if it creates a disruption on your campus.

In Tinker v. Des Moines, the U.S. Supreme Court outlined the parameters of “symbolic speech” in a public school system. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 395 U.S. 503 (1969). In the case, five students wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school banned these armbands immediately before any disagreement occurred and the case ensued. The Court found that while both students and teachers “do not shed their Constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate,” free speech may be limited by a governmental entity in certain contexts. In analyzing the case, the Court noted that the armbands were a “silent, passive expression of opinion unaccompanied by any disorder or disturbance.” The Court found that “fear of disturbance” is not enough to ban speech. To justify a prohibition of expression, the school must be able to show that “its action was caused by something more than a mere desire to avoid the discomfort and unpleasantness that always accompany an unpopular viewpoint.” Ultimately, the Court sided with the students because the armbands had caused no disruption or disorder at the time the prohibition was put in place.

When directing your staff not to engage in this type of political display, make sure that your school can meet the standard of “disruption” before prohibiting the expression. As a rule of thumb, if the student population is distracted by the display to the point where class time is disrupted, the Tinker standard can likely be met. Avoid prohibiting speech or expression before any disagreement has actually occurred simply because the District expects dissention. When faced with any First Amendment issue in your schools, it is advisable to contact your local school district’s attorney to ensure that the analysis is applied correctly to your specific facts.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Recent Articles

KBS Reference Desk: Evaluating SPED Teachers after COVID-19
April 2, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Pay During Closure
February 26, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Virtual Learning and Child Find
February 5, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: American Rescue Plan
January 29, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: TOMA Suspension Extension – Additional 30 days
January 15, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: Updated FFCRA Guidance
January 8, 2021
KBS Reference Desk: New Stay-at-Home Protocols
December 18, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Vaccine as a Requirement for School Attendance
December 11, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Campus Closure due to COVID-19 and Funding
December 4, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Nonexempt Volunteer Work
November 20, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: TPIA – 10-day Extension
November 6, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Discontinue Virtual Learning
October 30, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Political Dress
October 23, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Emergency Safety Drills
October 16, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Requests for Homebound Instruction During COVID
October 9, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Mask Exception
October 2, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: UIL Football Streaming
September 26, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Eligible Expenses Under Coronavirus Relief Fund
September 18, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Confidentiality and the ADA
September 11, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Threat Assessment
September 4, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Emergency Board Meetings
August 28, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: Homebound Services
August 21, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: COVID-19 Student Privacy and Virtual Learning
August 14, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: ADA Accommodations Based on Family Member’s Disability
August 7, 2020
KBS Reference Desk: EPSL EFML
July 31, 2020